(PC) Rajagopal v. Richardson et al
Plaintiff: Gopi Rajagopal
Defendant: Tracy Richardson and Modesto Police Department
Case Number: 1:2022cv01023
Filed: August 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: BakersfieldMJ
Referring Judge: Christopher D Baker
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Due to the appointment of Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker to the bench of the Eastern District of California, the court hereby reassigns this case from Bakersfield Magistrate Judge (BAK) to Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker for all further proceedings. (Martin-Gill, S)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Reassigning Magistrate Judge Baker, served on Gopi Rajagopal. (Martin-Gill, S)
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; ORDER Directing Payment of Inmate Filing Fee by the Stanislaus County Sheriff, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 08/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP Motion) (Maldonado, C)
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order served on Gopi Rajagopal. (Maldonado, C)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 9/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Maldonado, C)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF TEMPORARY MAGISTRATE JUDGE REFERRAL: Due to the elevation of Judge Jennifer L. Thurston to the position of U.S. District Judge, this action is temporarily referred to *Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin* until such time as a new Bakersfield magistrate judge is appointed. Documents filed in this case shall include the temporary magistrate judge initials *(GSA)* (Maldonado, C)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #3 Notice of Temporary Magistrate Judge Referral, served on Gopi Rajagopal. (Maldonado, C)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Gopi Rajagopal. (Maldonado, C)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Modesto Police Department, Tracy Richardson by Gopi Rajagopal. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Maldonado, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Rajagopal v. Richardson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gopi Rajagopal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tracy Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Modesto Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?