AuCopious, LLC et al v. SPG14, LLC et al
| AuCopious, LLC, James E Davis and Roy A Walker |
| SPG14, LLC, Dean B Larimer, Barbara E. Robinson Trust, Barbara E. Robinson and Thomas Robinson |
| 1:2022cv01073 |
| August 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| BakersfieldMJ |
| Christopher D Baker |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Due to the appointment of Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker to the bench of the Eastern District of California, the court hereby reassigns this case from Bakersfield Magistrate Judge (BAK) to Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker for all further proceedings. (Marrujo, C)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT SPG14 LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by SPG14, LLC. (Street, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry): The Court need not approve the parties' stipulation to extend time and proposed order for an extension of time filed by both parties (Doc. #9 ). Under Local Rule 144(a) "an initial stipulation extending time for no more than twenty-eight (28) days to respond to a complaint... may be filed without approval of the Court" if signed by all parties who have appeared. The parties' stipulation satisfies Local Rule 144(a). Signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 9/21/2022. (Glinzak, L)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT SPG14 LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER by SPG14, LLC. Attorney Street, Nicholas J. added. (Street, Nicholas) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Barbara E. Robinson Trust served on 9/18/2022, answer due 10/11/2022. (Kassouni, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Barbara E. Robinson served on 9/18/2022, answer due 10/11/2022. (Kassouni, Timothy) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Dean B Larimer served on 9/12/2022, answer due 10/3/2022. (Kassouni, Timothy) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: SPG14, LLC served on 8/31/2022, answer due 9/21/2022. (Kassouni, Timothy) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/15/2023 at 11:30 AM in Yosemite (HBK) before Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. (Attachments: #1 Worksheet, #2 Standing Order, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Barbara E. Robinson Trust, Dean B Larimer, Barbara E. Robinson, Thomas Robinson, SPG14, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Timothy Vartkes Kassouni* *Kassouni Law* *455 Capitol Mall, Suite 604* *Sacramento, CA 95814-4733*. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF TEMPORARY MAGISTRATE JUDGE REFERRAL: Due to the elevation of Judge Jennifer L. Thurston to the position of U.S. District Judge, this action is temporarily referred to *Magistrate Judge Helena Barch-Kuchta* until such time as a new Bakersfield magistrate judge is appointed. Documents filed in this case shall include the temporary magistrate judge initials *(HBK)* (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief, Injunctive Relief, and Damages against All Defendants by James E Davis, AuCopious, LLC, Roy A Walker. Attorney Kassouni, Timothy Vartkes added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10402361) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kassouni, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
