(HC) Martin v. Pogue
Jared Andrew Martin |
Tyson J. Pogue |
1:2022cv01113 |
September 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sheila K Oberto |
Jennifer L Thurston |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 JUDGMENT dated *9/15/2022* pursuant to #9 order. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING #6 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER DISMISSING Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Enter Judgment and CLOSE Case; ORDER DECLINING to Issue Certificate of Appealability, signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/14/2022. CASE CLOSED. (Rivera, O) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations, #10 Judgment served on Jared Andrew Martin. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 8 OBJECTIONS to #6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS by Petitioner Jared Andrew Martin. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Assign District Judge; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION to Dismiss Premature #1 Petition, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/6/2022. Referred to Judge Thurston; Objections to F&R due within twenty-one (21) days. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston and Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The new case number is: 1:22-cv-01113-JLT-SKO (HC). (Rivera, O) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, #6 Findings and Recommendation served on Jared Andrew Martin. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 10/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 3 ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Jared A. Martin signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/2/2022. (Marrujo, C) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #3 Order Authorizing IFP Status, Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Jared Andrew Martin. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Jared Andrew Martin. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 1 (2254) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Tyson J. Pogue by Jared Andrew Martin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marrujo, C) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (HC) Martin v. Pogue | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jared Andrew Martin | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Tyson J. Pogue | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.