Norton v. Law Offices of John D. Suhr et al
Gayle Norton |
Law Offices of John D. Suhr and John D. Suhr, Esq. |
1:2022cv01168 |
September 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Barbara A McAuliffe |
Jennifer L Thurston |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Veggian, Lauren) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/14/2022 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Lawrence, A) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Law Offices of John D. Suhr, John D. Suhr, Esq* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael Frederick Cardoza* *The Cardoza Law Corporation* *548 Market Street #80594* *San Francisco, CA 94104*. (Lawrence, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Law Offices of John D. Suhr, John D. Suhr by Gayle Norton. Attorney Cardoza, Michael Frederick added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10437049) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cardoza, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.