Gastelum v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fernando Gastelum
Defendant: Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv01173
Filed: September 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: BakersfieldMJ
Referring Judge: Ana de Alba
2 Judge: Christopher D Baker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Due to the appointment of Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker to the bench of the Eastern District of California, the court hereby reassigns this case from Bakersfield Magistrate Judge (BAK) to Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker for all further proceedings. (Marrujo, C)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Reassigning Magistrate Judge Baker, served on Fernando Gastelum. (Marrujo, C)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/19/2022 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before BakersfieldMJ. (Attachments: #1 BAK Worksheet, #2 Consent Form, #3 Informational Order Pro Se Info) (Martin-Gill, S)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Fernando Gastelum* *209 W. 9th Street* *Casa Grande, AZ 85122*. (Martin-Gill, S)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to Issue Certain New Case Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/28/2022. (Scheduling Conference set for 12/19/2022 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before BakersfieldMJ)(Martin-Gill, S)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Civil New Case Documents for ADA, #3 Order, #4 Summons served on Fernando Gastelum. (Martin-Gill, S)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF TEMPORARY MAGISTRATE JUDGE REFERRAL: Due to the elevation of Judge Jennifer L. Thurston to the position of U.S. District Judge, this action is temporarily referred to *Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean* until such time as a new Bakersfield magistrate judge is appointed. Documents filed in this case shall include the temporary magistrate judge initials *(EPG)* (Rivera, O)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. by Fernando Gastelum. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rivera, O)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order RECEIPT number CAE100051291 for $402.00 from Fernando Gastelum. (Rivera, O)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gastelum v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fernando Gastelum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?