(SS) Macias v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Lorena Macias
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2022cv01283
Filed: October 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sheila K Oberto
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/18/2022, answer due 11/8/2022. (Busani, Raquel)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Justin Lane Martin, GOVT for Commissioner of Social Security, attorney Social Security Admin- SS E-Service and US Attorney's Office- SS E-Service terminated (Martin, Justin)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Martin, Justin)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ELECTRONIC SERVICE: In accordance with the Social Security Scheduling Order in effect for cases filed on or after June 15, 2021, Defendant Commissioner of Social Security hereby acknowledges electronic service of the complaint through the Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel's designated email address on 10/20/2022. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Social Security Admin- SS E-Service, )
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #2 Summons, #3 Social Security New Case Documents for MJ as Presider, #1 Complaint served on Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to E-Service Agreement. (Lundstrom, T)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 1/9/2023. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Lundstrom, T)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Raquel Monique Busani* *6485 N. Palm Ave.* *Suite 105* *Fresno, CA 93704*. (Lundstrom, T)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Lorena Macias. Attorney Busani, Raquel Monique added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10484864) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Busani, Raquel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (SS) Macias v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lorena Macias
Represented By: Raquel Monique Busani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Social Security Admin- SS E-Service
Represented By: US Attorney's Office- SS E-Service
Represented By: Justin Lane Martin, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?