(PC) Asberry v. Relevante, et al.
Plaintiff: Tony Asberry
Defendant: C. Relevante, Lozovoy, Ferris and Godfrey
Case Number: 1:2022cv01365
Filed: October 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
Presiding Judge: Christopher D Baker
Nature of Suit: Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to Close Case signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 11/03/2022. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)
November 4, 2022 SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Dismissing Case served on Tony Asberry. (Flores, E)
November 2, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Tony Asberry. (Marrujo, C)
October 25, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to KVSP P.O. Box 5104 Delano, CA 93216-5104 by Tony Asberry. (Lundstrom, T)
October 25, 2022 Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 12/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Lundstrom, T)
October 25, 2022 Filing 2 *** STRICKEN BY #1 ORDER *** Plaintiff's construed Civil Rights Complaint seeking emergency relief by Tony Asberry.(Lundstrom, T)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER construing Plaintiff's Pleading as a New Complaint; directing Clerk of Court to open New Case and Transfer Pleading; directing Plaintiff to pay filing fee, file Application to proceed IFP, or Notice in New Action within 30-Days 263 signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 10/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application). (Lundstrom, T)
October 25, 2022 SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #2 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #1 Order served on Tony Asberry. (Lundstrom, T)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Asberry v. Relevante, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tony Asberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Relevante
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lozovoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ferris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Godfrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?