Dominguez v. Leprino Foods Company
| Christopher Dominguez |
| Leprino Foods Company |
| 1:2022cv01431 |
| November 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Ana de Alba |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
REPLY by Christopher Dominguez to RESPONSE to #8 Motion to Remand. (Agnew, Kristen)
|
|
Filing 10
OPPOSITION by Leprino Foods Company to #8 Motion to Remand. (Vinson, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Ana de Alba on 12/6/2022: (Text Only Entry)"The parties are advised that pursuant to the undersigned's standing order and Local Rule 230(g), the recently filed Motion to Remand #8 will be decided on the papers. No hearing will be calendared. Local Rule 230, as revised March 1, 2022, will govern the filing of oppositions and replies. The parties are further advised that due to the judicial resource emergency and COVID pandemic, there are more than 130 motions currently under submission in Judge de Alba's recently re-assigned caseload. The Court understands the impact that such a backlog has on the parties and is working to resolve all pending motions expeditiously. Unfortunately, despite all diligent efforts, it may still be months before the parties' pending motion is resolved. The Court appreciates your continued patience and reminds the parties that Magistrate Judge consent may alleviate some of the delays caused by the resource emergency." (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to REMAND by Christopher Dominguez. Motion Hearing set for 1/9/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 1 (ADA) before District Judge Ana de Alba. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Proposed Order)(Agnew, Kristen)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RELATING AND REASSIGNING CASE and Referring Case to the Magistrate Judge for Further Proceedings, signed by District Judge Ana de Alba on 11/28/2022. New Case Number: 1:22-cv-01431-ADA-EPG. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing 6
This case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Ana de Alba and U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto pursuant to 5 minute order; new case number is 1:22-cv-01431 ADA-SKO. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/9/2022: (Text Only Entry) In view of the "Notice of Related Case" indicating this case is related to Dominguez v. Leprino Foods Company, No. 1:22-cv-01018-ADA-EPG (Doc. #3 ), the Clerk of Court is hereby DIRECTED to assign this case to District Judge Ana de Alba for the purposes of relating and reassigning this case. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Leprino Foods Company. (Vinson, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) 1:22-cv-01018-ADA-EPG by Leprino Foods Company. (Vinson, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/7/2023 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A(m), #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE of REMOVAL from Kings County Superior, case number 22C-0317 by All Defendants. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10533542) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice Corporate Disclosure, #3 Proof of Service)(Vinson, Rachel)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
