Moreno Ortega v. Nissan North America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carlos Emmanuel Moreno Ortega
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv01581
Filed: December 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Ana de Alba
Referring Judge: Erica P Grosjean
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on February 6, 2023: As a Motion to Dismiss has been filed and noticed before the District Judge, document #12 , the Court vacates the Scheduling Conference set for March 21, 2023, before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Within ten days after the issuance of the ruling on the Motion to Dismiss, should the matter go forward, the parties are directed to contact Courtroom Deputy Michelle Rooney (mrooney@caed.uscourts.gov) to secure a new scheduling conference date. (Text Only Entry)(Rooney, M)
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Ana de Alba on 2/2/2023: (Text Only Entry) "The parties are advised that pursuant to the undersigned's standing order and Local Rule 230(g), the recently filed #12 Motion to Dismiss will be decided on the papers. No hearing will be calendared. Local Rule 230, as revised March 1, 2022, will govern the filing of oppositions and replies. The parties are further advised that due to the judicial resource emergency and COVID pandemic, there are more than 130 motions currently under submission in Judge de Alba's recently re-assigned caseload. The Court understands the impact that such a backlog has on the parties and is working to resolve all pending motions expeditiously. Unfortunately, despite all diligent efforts, it may still be months before the parties' pending motion is resolved. The Court appreciates your continued patience and orders the parties reconsider Magistrate Judge consent for all purposes or for the limited purpose of deciding this motion as this may alleviate some of the delays caused by the resource emergency." (Hernandez, M)
February 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION to DISMISS by Nissan North America, Inc.. Attorney Camagong, Joan R. added. Motion Hearing set for 3/20/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 1 before District Judge Ana de Alba. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1)(Camagong, Joan)
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/19/2023 recommending as follows: IT IS RECOMMENDED that Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. #6 ) be denied as moot. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the Court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within fourteen (14) days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). (Rooney, M)
January 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Nissan North America, Inc. by Carlos Emmanuel Moreno Ortega. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Amarkarian, Allen)
January 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Ana de Alba on 1/12/2023: (Text Only Entry) The pending #6 motion to dismiss is referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the preparation of findings and recommendations and/or other appropriate action.(Hernandez, M)
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Ana de Alba on 1/5/2023: (Text Only Entry) The parties are advised that pursuant to the undersigned's standing order and Local Rule 230(g), the recently filed #6 Motion to Dismiss will be decided on the papers. No hearing will be calendared. Local Rule 230, as revised March 1, 2022, will govern the filing of oppositions and replies. The parties are further advised that due to the judicial resource emergency and COVID pandemic, there are more than 130 motions currently under submission in Judge de Alba's recently re-assigned caseload. The Court understands the impact that such a backlog has on the parties and is working to resolve all pending motions expeditiously. Unfortunately, despite all diligent efforts, it may still be months before the parties' pending motion is resolved. The Court appreciates your continued patience and reminds the parties that Magistrate Judge consent may alleviate some of the delays caused by the resource emergency.(Hernandez, M)
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc.. (Nassihi, Amir)
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to DISMISS by Nissan North America, Inc.. Attorney Nassihi, Amir M. added. Motion Hearing set for 3/20/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 1 (ADA) before District Judge Ana de Alba. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Amir Nassihi, #3 Exhibit 1 to Amir Nassihi Declaration)(Nassihi, Amir)
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Nissan North America, Inc. served on 12/14/2022, answer due 1/4/2023. (Jacobson, Kevin)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/21/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Lawrence, A)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Nissan North America, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Kevin Y. Jacobson* *Quill & Arrow LLP* *10900 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 300* *Los Angeles, CA 90024*. (Lawrence, A)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Carlos Emmanuel Moreno Ortega (Jacobson, Kevin)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nissan North America, Inc. by Carlos Emmanuel Moreno Ortega. Attorney Jacobson, Kevin Y. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10590591) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Jacobson, Kevin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moreno Ortega v. Nissan North America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Emmanuel Moreno Ortega
Represented By: Kevin Y. Jacobson
Represented By: Allen Amarkarian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc.
Represented By: Amir M. Nassihi
Represented By: Joan R. Camagong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?