(HC) Otuya v. FCI Mendota Warden
Petitioner: Kingsley Otuya
Respondent: FCI Mendota Warden
Case Number: 1:2022cv01615
Filed: December 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sheila K Oberto
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rodriguez, Michelle)
December 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #5 Order, #6 Order Re Consent or Request for Reassignment served on Attorney General HC - Tami Krenzin. (Rivera, O)
December 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/21/2022. Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Rivera, O)
December 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING Respondent to File a Response; ORDER SETTING Briefing Schedule; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Serve Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/20/2022. Clerk to serve a copy of this order and copy of the Petition on the Attorney General. Answer due within sixty (60) days. Notice of appearance due within twenty (20) days. (Rivera, O)
December 21, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order, #6 Order Re Consent or Request for Reassignment served on Kingsley Otuya. (Rivera, O)
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 1/23/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Lundstrom, T)
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS #2 as to Kingsley Otuya signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/19/2022. (Lundstrom, T)
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #3 Order Authorizing IFP Status served on Kingsley Otuya. (Lundstrom, T)
December 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Kingsley Otuya. (Lundstrom, T)
December 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against FCI Mendota Warden by Kingsley Otuya. (Lundstrom, T).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Otuya v. FCI Mendota Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kingsley Otuya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FCI Mendota Warden
Represented By: Bureau of Prisons Regional Counsel
Represented By: US Attorney's Office- 2241 Unit
Represented By: Michelle Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?