(SS) Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Michael Wilce Johnson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2022cv01636
Filed: December 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Erica P Grosjean
Nature of Suit: Social Security: HIA
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on February 17, 2023, as follows: Pursuant to the parties' stipulation (ECF No. #7 ), IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant shall have an extension, up to and including March 27, 2023, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (Rooney, M)
February 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for L. Jamala Edwards re #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security. (Edwards, L.)
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Edwards, L.)
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by L. Jamala Edwards on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. Attorney Edwards, L. Jamala added. (Edwards, L.)
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #3 Social Security New Case Documents for MJ as Presider, #1 Complaint, #2 Summons served on Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to E-Service Agreement. (Lundstrom, T)
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 3/30/2023. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Lundstrom, T)
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Josephine Mary Gerrard* *Gerrard Law Offices* *1791 Solano Ave., Suite F01* *Berkeley, CA 94707*. (Lundstrom, T)
December 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Michael Wilce Johnson. Attorney Gerrard, Josephine Mary added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10615402) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gerrard, Josephine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (SS) Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Wilce Johnson
Represented By: Josephine Mary Gerrard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Social Security Admin- SS E-Service
Represented By: US Attorney's Office- SS E-Service
Represented By: L. Jamala Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?