Gaponyuk v. Alferov et al
| Sergey Gaponyuk |
| EVGENY ALFEROV, SERGEI KOLOSOVSKII, MIHAIL VERSHININ, ALEXANDER CHERNOV, DAVID BROWN and NATALIA ABRAMOVA |
| 1:2023at00566 |
| July 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Sergey Gaponyuk . (Attachments: #1 TRO Checklist, #2 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #3 Declaration of Filipp Petkevitch)(Johnson, Alexander) |
| Filing 3 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Sergey Gaponyuk for attorney Evgeny Krasnov to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-10944890) (Johnson, Alexander) |
| Filing 2 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Sergey Gaponyuk for attorney Filipp Petkevitch to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-10944839) (Johnson, Alexander) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Sergey Gaponyuk. Attorney Johnson, Alexander J. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10944696) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Johnson, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
