Singh v. Jaddou et al
| Jaswinder Singh |
| Ur M. Jaddou, Tracy Renaud, Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick Garland |
| 1:2023cv00222 |
| February 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 REPLY by Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud re #6 Motion to Dismiss,, Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction,. (Wong, Elliot) |
Filing 9
CONSENT MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) signed by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/21/2023, Nunc Pro Tunc 03/20/2023: All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings in this action, including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). Accordingly, this Court AUTHORIZES the action to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. All further papers filed in this action shall bear the case number 1:23-cv-00222-SKO. (Kusamura, W)
|
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Wong, Elliot) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/20/2023: (Text Only Entry) Due to the status of the case, Defendants are DIRECTED to file their consent or declination to jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, found at Doc. 3-2, as soon as is practicable, but in any event no later than March 29, 2023.(Kusamura, W)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to DISMISS, MOTION to DISMISS for LACK of JURISDICTION ( Motion Hearing set for 5/24/2023 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto.) by Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Elliot Wong)(Wong, Elliot) |
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elliot C. Wong, GOVT for Merrick Garland,Elliot C. Wong, GOVT for Ur M. Jaddou,Elliot C. Wong, GOVT for Alejandro Mayorkas,Elliot C. Wong, GOVT for Tracy Renaud (Wong, Elliot) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Siguenza, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/15/2023 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A(m), #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Joseph John Siguenza* *L/O Ashwani Bhakhri* *1818 Gilbreth Rd., Ste 145* *Burlingame, CA 94010*. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Jaswinder Singh. Attorney Siguenza, Joseph John added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10698938) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to 4, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Siguenza, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
