One Stop Gas & Liquor Market, Inc. v. United States of America
| One Stop Gas & Liquor Market, Inc. a California corporation Doing business as One Stop Market & Liquor and Esam Alst |
| United States of America |
| 1:2023cv00231 |
| February 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Helena M Barch-Kuchta |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
TEXT ONLY ORDER DISREGARDING Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. #6 ) in light of Plaintiff's Notice of Withdrawal of Motion filed on March 1, 2023, (Doc. No. #8 ). The Clerk of Court shall vacate the March 29, 2023 hearing date associated with the Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 3/2/2023. (Apodaca, P)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE Plaintiffs' Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Cancellation of Hearing Scheduled for March 29, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. by Esam Alst, One Stop Gas & Liquor Market, Inc. re #6 MOTION for PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Notice of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Memorandum in Support; Affidavit of Plaintiff, Esam Alst and Proposed Order. (Tapp, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by One Stop Gas & Liquor Market, Inc., Esam Alst. United States of America served on 2/21/2023, answer due 4/24/2023. (Attachments: #1 E-Filing Notice A-Proof of Service)(Tapp, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Notice of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Memorandum in Support; Affidavit of Plaintiff, Esam Alst and Proposed Order by Esam Alst, One Stop Gas & Liquor Market, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 3/29/2023 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-USDA Final Agency Decision, #2 Exhibit B-Affidavit of Plaintiff, Esam Alst, #3 Exhibit C-2021 Profit & Loss Statement, #4 Proposed Order)(Tapp, Andrew) |
|
Filing 5
TEXT ONLY ORDER GRANTING #4 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Having satisfied the requirements of Local Rule 180(b)(2), Attorney Andrew Z. Tapp, may appear on behalf of Plaintiffs One Stop Gas & Liquor Market, Inc. and Esam Alst. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 02/17/2023. (Barch-Kuchta, Helena)
|
| Filing 4 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Esam Alst, One Stop Gas & Liquor Market, Inc. for attorney Andrew Z. Tapp to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-10702012) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Certificate of Good Standing)(Obagi, Zein) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/18/2023 at 11:30 AM in Yosemite (HBK) before Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A(m), #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *United States of America* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Zein E. Obaji, Jr.* *1611 Pacific Coast Highway* *Suite 105* *Redondo Beach, CA 90277*. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America by One Stop Gas & Liquor Market, Inc., a California Corporation d/b/a One Stop Market & Liquor, Esam Alst. Attorney Obagi, Zein E. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10700121) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Obagi, Zein) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
