Goodwin v. The California Department of Insurance et al
| Duchun Lafre Goodwin |
| The California Department of Insurance, Liza Pedrosa, David Axelton and Theresa Gallagher |
| 1:2023cv00259 |
| February 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Helena M Barch-Kuchta |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SCREENING ORDER granting Plaintiff leave to file amended complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 4/20/2023. Amended Complaint due by 5/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Complaint Form). (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 4/19/2023. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order served on Duchun Lafre Goodwin. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Duchun Lafre Goodwin. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Duchun Lafre Goodwin. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against David Axelton, Theresa Gallagher, Liza Pedrosa, The California Department of Insurance by Duchun Lafre Goodwin.(Lundstrom, T)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
