Storm v. Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership et al
| Daniel Storm |
| Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership, Yosemite Hospitality, LLC and Aramark |
| 1:2023cv00315 |
| March 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Ana de Alba |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 7/11/2023 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Aramark, Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership, Yosemite Hospitality, LLC. (Frederick, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants Aramark, Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership, Yosemite Hospitality, LLC. (Frederick, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Aramark, Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership, Yosemite Hospitality, LLC (Frederick, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Mariposa County Superior Court, case number 23-CVCV-0011906 by Daniel Storm. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10726319) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Answer to Complaint)(Frederick, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
