Balanj, et al. v. Blinken
| Sargon Rashidi Balanj and Sona Noroozi Asl |
| Antony J. Blinken |
| 1:2023cv00408 |
| March 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Ana de Alba |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Sargon Rashidi Balanj, Sona Noroozi Asl. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Morrison, Curtis) |
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elliot C. Wong, GOVT for Antony J. Blinken (Wong, Elliot) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 7/20/2023 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Antony J. Blinken* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Curtis Lee Morrison* *Morrison Urena, L.C.* *8910 University Center Lane, Suite 400* *San Diego, CA 92122*. (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against Antony J. Blinken by Sargon Rashidi Balanj, Sona Noroozi Asl. Attorney Morrison, Curtis Lee added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10754350) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Morrison, Curtis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
