Sidhu vs Wright et al
| Kamalpreet Kaur Sidhu |
| Jack W Wright, Ramiro Minero, Emerita Minero and Andrea Wright |
| 1:2023cv00417 |
| March 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Christopher D Baker |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) Pursuant to Local Rule 302, the recently-filed motion to dismiss #7 will be heard and decided by the undersigned. As set forth in the Court's standing order, no hearing will be calendared, and the matter will be decided on the papers. As a result of the ongoing judicial resource emergency in this District, more than 100 regular civil motions remain under submission before the undersigned. As a result, it is likely to be six or more months until the motion(s) in this matter is resolved. The Court reiterates that magistrate judge consent can alleviate the delay caused by the resource emergency. The parties SHALL reconsider magistrate judge consent for all purposes or only for this pending motion. In addition, the parties are reminded of their ongoing obligation to inform the Court of any changed circumstances that have rendered all or part of any pending motion moot. Finally, the parties are informed that the undersigned generally requires a formal settlement conference take place before any civil case proceeds to trial. Should the parties jointly wish to schedule a settlement conference, they are directed to contact Courtroom Deputy Irma Munoz at imunoz@caed.uscourts.gov signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on May 18, 2023. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing 13
REQUEST for FOR LEAVE TO FILE A LONGER OPPOSITION TO THE WRIGHT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS EXCEEDING TWENTY-FIVE (25) PAGES; PROOF OF SERVICE by Kamalpreet Kaur Sidhu re #1 Complaint filed by Kamalpreet Kaur Sidhu, #11 Opposition to Motion filed by Kamalpreet Kaur Sidhu, #10 REQUEST for PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE A LONGER OPPOSITION TO THE WRIGHT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS EXCEEDING TWENTY-FIVE (25) PAGES by Kamalpreet Kaur Sidhu re #7 MOTION to DISMISS filed by Jack W Wright. filed by Kamalpreet Kaur Sidhu, 12 Order on Request,,,. (Kamath, Reshma)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's motion to exceed the 25-page limit in its opposition to the motion to dismiss #10 . Plaintiff's request did not include a certification that it met and conferred with opposing counsel prior to filing the request, as required by the undersigned's standing order (Doc. 4-2 at 2.) Moreover, the request does not present a sufficient justification to exceed the page-limit. It merely states that the matter involves complex facts and law; however, the original motion only consists of 11 pages (Doc. 7). Accordingly, Plaintiff's request to exceed the page limit #10 is DENIED without prejudice. Unless a revised version is filed, only the first 25 pages of the opposition will be considered signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on May 12, 2023. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing 11
OPPOSITION by Kamalpreet Kaur Sidhu to #7 Motion to Dismiss, #10 Request. (Kamath, Reshma)
|
|
Filing 10
REQUEST for PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE A LONGER OPPOSITION TO THE WRIGHT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS EXCEEDING TWENTY-FIVE (25) PAGES by Kamalpreet Kaur Sidhu re #7 MOTION to DISMISS filed by Jack W Wright. (Kamath, Reshma)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Emerita Minero served on 5/4/2023, answer due 5/25/2023. (Kamath, Reshma)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Ramiro Minero served on 5/4/2023, answer due 5/25/2023. (Kamath, Reshma)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to DISMISS by Jack W Wright. Attorney Tsoong, Victoria J. added. Motion Hearing set for 7/7/2023 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (JLT) before District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Proposed Order)(Tsoong, Victoria)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Andrea Wright served on 4/7/2023, answer due 4/28/2023. (Kamath, Reshma)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Jack W Wright served on 4/7/2023, answer due 4/28/2023. (Kamath, Reshma)
|
|
Filing 4
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/26/2023 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. (Attachments: #1 Worksheet, #2 Standing Order, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Emerita Minero, Ramiro Minero, Andrea Wright, Jack W Wright* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Reshma Kamath* *Law Office of Reshma Kamath* *700 El Camino Real, Suite 120 1084* *Menlo Park, CA 94025*. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by KAMALPREET KAUR SIDHU (Kamath, Reshma)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants by KAMALPREET KAUR SIDHU. Attorney Kamath, Reshma added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10757070) (Kamath, Reshma)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
