Steen v. Starbucks Coffee Company et al
Plaintiff: Maria Elvia Steen
Defendant: Starbucks Coffee Company and Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 1:2023cv00464
Filed: March 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Ana de Alba
Referring Judge: Helena M Barch-Kuchta
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #4 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Remand and Remanding Action to Tulare County Superior Court signed by District Judge Ana de Alba on 5/6/2023. CASE CLOSED. Certified copy of remand order sent to other court. (Lawrence, A)
May 3, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND by Starbucks Coffee Company, Starbucks Corporation re #4 MOTION to REMAND . (Bradley, Lindy)
April 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Ana de Alba on 4/21/2023: (Text Only Entry) "On April 19, 2023, the plaintiff filed a #4 motion to remand and erroneously noticed the motion for hearing before Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on May 24, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the hearing set for May 24, 2023, and resets the motion before District Judge Ana de Alba. The parties are advised that pursuant to the undersigned's standing order and Local Rule 230(g), the recently filed #4 motion to remand will be decided on the papers. No hearing will be calendared. Local Rule 230, as revised March 1, 2022, will govern the filing of oppositions and replies. The parties are further advised that due to the judicial resource emergency and COVID pandemic, there are more than 130 motions currently under submission in Judge de Alba's recently re-assigned caseload. The Court understands the impact that such a backlog has on the parties and is working to resolve all pending motions expeditiously. Unfortunately, despite all diligent efforts, it may still be months before the parties' pending motion is resolved. The Court appreciates your continued patience and orders the parties reconsider Magistrate Judge consent for all purposes or for the limited purpose of deciding this motion as this may alleviate some of the delays caused by the resource emergency." (Hernandez, M)
April 19, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION to REMAND by Maria Elvia Steen. Motion Hearing set for 5/24/2023 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Martin Gasparian in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Remand, #2 Proposed Order Order to Remand the matter to Tulare County Superior Court)(Gasparian, Martin)
March 29, 2023 Filing 3 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Starbucks Corporation.(Bradley, Lindy)
March 28, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/29/2023 at 10:00 AM in Yosemite (HBK) before Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Sant Agata, S)
March 27, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Tulare County, case number VCU295896 by Starbucks Corporation. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10769675) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Notice Notice of Interested Parties, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Bradley, Lindy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steen v. Starbucks Coffee Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Elvia Steen
Represented By: Martin Gasparian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Coffee Company
Represented By: Lindy Bradley
Represented By: Mellania Safarian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Mellania Safarian
Represented By: Lindy Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?