(HC) Galaz v. Pfeiffer
Petitioner: Donaldo Galaz
Respondent: Christian Pfeiffer
Case Number: 1:2023cv00468
Filed: March 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Ana de Alba
Referring Judge: Christopher D Baker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS That the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be Dismissed With Prejudice and Without Leave to Amend, signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 5/22/2023. Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Marrujo, C)
May 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Ana de Alba and Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. The new case number is: 1:23-cv-00468-ADA-CDB. (Marrujo, C)
May 23, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #12 Findings and Recommendations (Motion), 11 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Donaldo Galaz. (Marrujo, C)
May 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS by Donaldo Galaz. (Rivera, O)
April 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Sant Agata, S)
April 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING Without Prejudice Petition WITH LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED PETITION signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 4/7/2023. Thirty (30) Day Deadline. (Attachments: #1 2254 Petition, #2 1983 Complaint Form)(Sant Agata, S)
April 7, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order Dismissing Case with Leave to Amend, served on Donaldo Galaz. (Sant Agata, S)
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Rivera, O)
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Central; Case Number 2:23-cv-01504.
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. For these reasons, the Court finds that transferring this action to the Eastern District of California is in the interests of justice. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [See document for further details.] Transferring case to Eastern District of California electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (es) [Transferred from cacd on 3/28/2023.]
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Donaldo Galaz. (Rivera, O)
March 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Donaldo Galaz. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number 129. (jo) [Transferred from cacd on 3/28/2023.]
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap) [Transferred from cacd on 3/28/2023.]
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice Re: Discrepancies in Filing of Habeas Corpus Petition (CV-111). Upon submission of your petition for writ of habeas corpus, it was noted that you did not pay the appropriate filing fee. If you are unable to pay the entire filing fee at this time, you must sign and complete the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support form (CV-60P) attached. You may return your fee waiver and/or payment to any of the Courthouses listed on this notice. If you do not respond within THIRTY DAYS from the date below, your action may be dismissed. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . (ghap) [Transferred from cacd on 3/28/2023.]
February 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E Scott.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Donaldo Galaz. (ghap) [Transferred from cacd on 3/28/2023.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Galaz v. Pfeiffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Donaldo Galaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Christian Pfeiffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?