Rios v. Carrillo et al
| Elias Cervantes Rios |
| Eduardo Carrillo, Hilario Palomino and City of Farmersville |
| 1:2023cv00479 |
| March 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Ana de Alba |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Eduardo Carrillo, City of Farmersville, Hilario Palomino. Attorney Longyear, Dayton Van Vranken added.(Longyear, Dayton) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: All Defendants. (Sullivan, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 7/25/2023 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Eduardo Carrillo, City of Farmersville, Hilario Palomino* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Ryan P Sullivan* *Sullivan Cruz, Attorneys at Law* *505 North West Street* *Visalia, CA 93291*. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against eduardo carrillo, hilario palomino, City of Farmersville by Elias Cervantes Rios. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10773696) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet)(Sullivan, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
