(SS) O'Neal v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Christopher O'Neal
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2023cv00619
Filed: April 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Ana de Alba
Referring Judge: Stanley A Boone
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Ana de Alba and Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. The new case number is: 1:23-cv-00619-ADA-SAB. (Rivera, O)
May 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Prato, Justin)
May 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Marriott, Michael)
May 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Michael K. Marriott, GOVT for Commissioner of Social Security, attorney Social Security Admin- SS E-Service terminated (Marriott, Michael)
April 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Complaint, #2 Summons, #3 Social Security New Case Documents for MJ as Presider served on Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to E-Service Agreement. (Lundstrom, T)
April 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 7/24/2023. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Lundstrom, T)
April 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Justin Prato* *Prato & Reichman* *3675 Ruffin Road, Suite 220* *San Diego, CA 92123*. (Lundstrom, T)
April 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Christopher O'Neal. Attorney Prato, Justin added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10818977) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Prato, Justin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (SS) O'Neal v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher O'Neal
Represented By: Justin Prato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Social Security Admin- SS E-Service
Represented By: US Attorney's Office- SS E-Service
Represented By: Michael K. Marriott, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?