(SS) Burell v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Jeffrey Clifford Burell |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2023cv00787 |
| May 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Christopher D Baker |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF LODGING SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSCRIPT IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT by Commissioner of Social Security. Attorney Lodge, Jeffrey James added. (Attachments: #1 Complete Certified Administrative Record)(Lodge, Jeffrey) |
Filing 10
CONSENT MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) signed by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/31/2023: All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings in this action, including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). Accordingly, this Court AUTHORIZES the action to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. All further papers filed in this action shall bear the case number 1:23-cv-00787-CDB.(Maldonado, C)
|
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Gonzalez de Llano, Oscar) |
| Filing 8 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Oscar Gonzalez de Llano, GOVT for Commissioner of Social Security, attorney Social Security Admin- SS E-Service terminated (Gonzalez de Llano, Oscar) |
| Filing 7 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #5 Summons, #1 Social Security Complaint, #3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, #6 Social Security New Case Documents for MJ as Presider served on Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to E-Service Agreement. (Flores, E) |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 8/28/2023. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Flores, E)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Steven Gilbert Rosales* *Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing* *12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115* *Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670*. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rosales, Steven) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 05/24/2023. (Flores, E)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Jeffrey Clifford Burell. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rosales, Steven) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT For Review Of Final Decision Of The Commissioner Of Social Security against Commissioner of Social Security by Jeffrey Clifford Burell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certification of interested parties)(Rosales, Steven) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Sant Agata, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
