A. L. v. City of Bakersfield, et al.
A. L. |
City of Bakersfield and Michael Mayorga |
1:2023cv00885 |
June 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Christopher D Baker |
Jennifer L Thurston |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT MICHAEL MAYORGA TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT by Michael Mayorga. Attorney Marderosian, Michael G. added. (Marderosian, Michael) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: A. L. served on 7/6/2023, answer due 7/27/2023. (Sehat, Cameron) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: A. L. served on 6/16/2023, answer due 7/7/2023. (Sehat, Cameron) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 8/31/2023 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield (CDB) before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. (Attachments: #1 CDB Worksheet, #2 Standing Order, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of Bakersfield, Michael Mayorga* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Cameron Sehat* *The Sehat Law Firm, PLC* *5100 Campus Drive, Suite 200* *Newport Beach, CA 92660*. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by A. L.. Attorney Sehat, Cameron added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10903403) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sehat, Cameron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.