(HC) Drister v. Arviza
Petitioner: Leonard O. Drister
Respondent: M. Arviza
Case Number: 1:2023cv01109
Filed: July 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
Presiding Judge: Ana de Alba
Referring Judge: Erica P Grosjean
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Assign District Judge; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION to Dismiss #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/18/2023. Referred to Judge de Alba; Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Rivera, O)
August 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Ana de Alba and Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The new case number is: 1:23-cv-01109-ADA-EPG (HC). (Rivera, O)
August 18, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: 8 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, #9 Findings and Recommendation served on Leonard O. Drister. (Rivera, O)
August 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DENYING #6 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/7/2023. (Lundstrom, T)
August 7, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel served on Leonard O. Drister. (Lundstrom, T)
August 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Leonard O. Drister. (Xiong, J.)
August 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Xiong, J.)
July 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER AUTHORIZING #2 IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Leonard Drister signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 07/25/2023. (Xiong, J.)
July 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due within 30 days. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Xiong, J.)
July 26, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #4 Order Authorizing IFP Status served on Leonard O. Drister. (Xiong, J.)
July 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Leonard O. Drister. (Xiong, J.)
July 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 (2241) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against M. Arviza by Leonard O. Drister.(Xiong, J.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Drister v. Arviza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Leonard O. Drister
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. Arviza
Represented By: Bureau of Prisons Regional Counsel
Represented By: US Attorney's Office- 2241 Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?