Anderson v. Sodexo, Inc., et al.
| James Anderson |
| Sodexo, Inc. and SDH Services West, LLC |
| 1:2023cv01177 |
| August 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Ana de Alba |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Clerk to Close the Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/19/2023. CASE CLOSED. (Rivera, O)
|
| Filing 3 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PER FRCP 41(A)(2) - AND [PROPOSED] ORDER by SDH Services West, LLC. (Campbell, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/2/2023 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, Kings County, case number 23CU0283 by James Anderson. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11001177) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Declaration Dec of Kimberly Shackelford ISO, #4 Defendant's Rule 7.1 Disclosure, #5 Designation of Counsel, #6 Proof of Service Defendant's Proof of Service)(Campbell, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
