(PC) Maestas v. Solorio
| Randy V. Maestas |
| Samantha Solorio |
| 1:2023cv01197 |
| August 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations served on Randy V. Maestas. (Rivera, O)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER ADOPTING #5 Findings and Recommendations in Full, DENYING #2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, and DIRECTING Plaintiff to Pay the Filing Fee in Full, signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/30/2023. $402.00 filing fee due within thirty days. (Rivera, O)
|
|
Filing 8
OBJECTIONS to #5 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS by Plaintiff Randy V. Maestas. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing 7
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE to the Court by Randy V. Maestas. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing 5
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be Denied and that Plaintiff be Requested to Pay the $402.00 Filing Fee in Full if he wants to Proceed with this Action signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 08/15/2023. Referred to Judge Thurston; Objections to F&R due within Fourteen-Days. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston and Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The new case number is: 1:23-cv-1197 JLT-EPG. (Flores, E)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, #5 Findings and Recommendations (Motion), served on Randy V. Maestas. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due within 30 days. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Xiong, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Randy V. Maestas. (Xiong, J.)
|
|
Filing 1
(1983)PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Samantha Solorio by Randy V. Maestas.(Xiong, J.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Randy V. Maestas. (Xiong, J.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Maestas v. Solorio | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Randy V. Maestas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Samantha Solorio | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
