(PC) Ryland v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s) et al
| Corey R Ryland |
| Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s), North Central Regional Director, J.C. Streeval, Assistant Warden, Captain Bowles, Lt. Hamilton, Lt. Smith, Lt. Lovell, Lt. Mullens and Bradburn |
| 1:2023cv01307 |
| September 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Gary S Austin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| OTHER COURT CASE NUMBER from Western District of Virginia case number 7:23-cv-00581. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/7/2023. (Lawrence, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order served on Corey R Ryland. (Lawrence, A) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 1 (1331) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Assistant Warden, Bowles, Bradburn, Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s), Hamilton, Lovell, Mullens, North Central Regional Director, Smith, J.C. Streeval by Corey R Ryland. (Rivera, O) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Corey R Ryland. (Rivera, O) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
