Deerpoint Group, Inc. v. GAR Bennett LLC
| Deerpoint Group, Inc. |
| GAR Bennett LLC |
| 1:2023cv01340 |
| September 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Barbara A McAuliffe |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Deerpoint Group, Inc..(Michaelson, Jon) |
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING #11 Application for Pro Hac Vice, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/23/2023. Added attorney Thomas Lee Dyer, PHV for Defendant GAR Bennett LLC. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING #10 Application for Pro Hac Vice, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/23/2023. Added attorney Donald Lake, PHV for Defendant GAR Bennett LLC. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Marrujo, C)
|
| Filing 11 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by GAR Bennett LLC for attorney Thomas Lee Dyer to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-11142001) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proof of Service)(Brucker, Gary) |
| Filing 10 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by GAR Bennett LLC for attorney Donald E Lake, III to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-11141985) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proof of Service)(Brucker, Gary) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Deerpoint Group, Inc., Counter Defendant Deerpoint Group, Inc.. (Michaelson, Jon) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER with Jury Demand, COUNTERCLAIM against Deerpoint Group, Inc. by GAR Bennett LLC. by GAR Bennett LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Interested Parties, #2 Proof of Service)(Brucker, Gary) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by GAR Bennett LLC. Attorney Brucker, Gary K. added. (Brucker, Gary) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: GAR Bennett LLC served on 9/12/2023, answer due 10/3/2023. (Michaelson, Jon) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER RELATING CASES and REASSIGNING DISTRICT JUDGE signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 09/13/2023. New Case Number: 1:23-CV-01340 JLT-BAM.(Flores, E)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) 1:18-cv-00536-JLT-BAM by Deerpoint Group, Inc.. (Michaelson, Jon) |
| Filing 3 PATENT NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED as to Patent #1:* 10,271,474 * * 04/30/2019 * * Miller, et al. * Patent #2:* 10,645,868 * * 05/12/2020 * * Miller, et al. * ; copy of Complaint and Patent Report emailed to U.S. Office of Patents and Trademarks. Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/12/2023 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A(m), #2 Consent Form, #3 Patent Report, #4 VDRP) (Xiong, J.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *GAR Bennett LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jon Michaelson* *Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP* *1302 El Camino Real, Suite 175* *Menlo Park, CA 94025*. (Xiong, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GAR Bennett LLC by Deerpoint Group, Inc.. Attorney Michaelson, Jon added. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-18, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11063876) (Michaelson, Jon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
