Escobedo v. Gazebo Gardens, Inc. et al
| Jose Escobedo |
| Gazebo Gardens, Inc. Doing business as Gazebo Gardens Nursery and Gazebo Properties, LLC |
| 1:2023cv01390 |
| September 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ANSWER by Gazebo Gardens, Inc., Gazebo Properties, LLC. Attorney Wieland, Ian Blade added.(Wieland, Ian) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/4/2024 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A(m), #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Xiong, J.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Gazebo Gardens, Inc., Gazebo Properties, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tanya E. Moore* *Moore Law Firm, P.C.* *300 South First St., Suite 342* *San Jose, CA 95113*. (Xiong, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) against All Defendants by Jose Escobedo. Attorney Moore, Tanya E. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11091898) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Tanya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
