(HC) Roman v. Trate
Petitioner: Justin Roman
Respondent: B. M. Trate
Case Number: 1:2023cv01411
Filed: September 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sheila K Oberto
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Dismissing #7 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time as Moot signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/25/2023. (Xiong, J.)
October 26, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order on Motion for Extension of Time served on Justin Roman. (Xiong, J.)
October 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for 60-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME by Justin Roman. (Lawrence, A)
October 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rivera, O)
October 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Flores, E)
September 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/28/2023. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on Respondent. Consent or Decline due by 12/1/2023. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Lundstrom, T)
September 29, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition served on Justin Roman. (Lundstrom, T)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Justin Roman signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 09/27/2023. (Xiong, J.)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due within 30 days. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Xiong, J.)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 (2241) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against B. M. Trate by Justin Roman.(Xiong, J.)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #3 Order Authorizing IFP Status served on Justin Roman. (Xiong, J.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Roman v. Trate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Justin Roman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: B. M. Trate
Represented By: Bureau of Prisons Regional Counsel
Represented By: US Attorney's Office- 2241 Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?