(SS) Galvan v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Agapito Jose Galvan |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2023cv01415 |
| September 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
CONSENT MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) signed by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/20/2023, Nunc Pro Tunc 10/19/2023: All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings in this action, including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). Accordingly, this Court AUTHORIZES the action to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. All further papers filed in this action shall bear the case number 1:23-cv-01415-SKO (SS).(Kusamura, W)
|
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Pena, Jonathan) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Pena, Jonathan) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Gonzalez de Llano, Oscar) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Oscar Gonzalez de Llano, GOVT for Commissioner of Social Security, attorney Social Security Admin- SS E-Service and US Attorney's Office- SS E-Service terminated (Gonzalez de Llano, Oscar) |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Social Security Complaint, #4 Summons, #5 Social Security New Case Documents for MJ as Presider, #3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to E-Service Agreement. (Sant Agata, S) |
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 1/5/2024. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Sant Agata, S)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Jonathan Omar Pena* *2440 Tulare Street* *Suite 320* *Fresno, CA 93721*. (Sant Agata, S) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/2/2023. (Sant Agata, S)
|
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Xiong, J.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Agapito Jose Galvan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pena, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Agapito Jose Galvan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pena, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
