Young v. Custer. et al.
| Sidney Kang |
| Custer and Christian Pfeiffer |
| 1:2023cv01519 |
| October 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| No District Court Judge |
| Ana de Alba |
| Christopher D Baker |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Due to the elevation of U.S. District Judge Ana I. de Alba to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the court finds it necessary to temporarily reassign this case to No District Court Judge (NODJ) until a new district judge is appointed. (Nguyen, J)
|
|
Filing 4
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/24/2024 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield (CDB) before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Worksheet, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Custer, Christian Pfeiffer* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Do Kim* *Law Offices of Do Kim, APLC* *3435 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2700* *Los Angeles, CA 90010*. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by All Plaintiffs. (Kim, Do)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Katie Young. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11147849) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet)(Kim, Do)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
