Dunn v. HUD / Urban Development, et al.
| Alana Dunn |
| HUD / Urban Development, Freedom Mortgages, London Property Real Estate and 21 Centry Real Estate |
| 1:2023cv01565 |
| November 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Other Fraud |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Alana Dunn.(Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing 5
FIRST SCREENING ORDER; ORDER DENYING #3 "Motion for a Trial" signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/27/2023. Thirty (30) Day Deadline. (Xiong, J.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order served on Alana Dunn. (Xiong, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/8/2023. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Alana Dunn. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for a trial by Alana Dunn. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Alana Dunn. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against 21 Centry Real Estate, Freedom Mortgages, HUD / Urban Development, London Property Real Estate by Alana Dunn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Lundstrom, T)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
