Escobedo v. Giganova, L.P. et al
Jose Escobedo |
Giganova, L.P., Tom Sarun Doing business as Launderland, Andy Moua Doing business as Asian Kitchen, Pada Ly Vang Doing business as Pada Salon and Jesus Maria Millan Doing business as La Placita Restaurant |
1:2023cv01627 |
November 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sheila K Oberto |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Vaughan, Cris) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Tom Sarun. Attorney Vaughan, Cris C. added. (Vaughan, Cris) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE to #10 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE by Jose Escobedo. (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Giganova, L.P. served on 1/6/2024, answer due 1/29/2024. (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Tom Sarun served on 12/13/2023, answer due 1/3/2024. (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Jesus Maria Millan served on 12/13/2023, answer due 1/3/2024. (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/10/2024: (Text Only Entry); The Court is in receipt of Defendant Andy Moua's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #9 ). Because defendants are not required to pay a filing fee (see 28 U.S.C. 1914) the request is DENIED as moot. (Kusamura, W) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: 11 Minute Order, Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, served on Andy Moua, Pada Ly Vang. (Kusamura, W) |
Filing 10 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/9/2024. (Kusamura, W) |
Filing 9 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Andy Moua. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 8 ANSWER by Andy Moua.(Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 6 PROOF of SERVICE re #5 Answer to Complaint by Pada Ly Vang. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Pada Ly Vang. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Andy Moua served on 12/20/2023, answer due 1/10/2024. (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/20/2024 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A(m), #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Giganova, L.P., Jesus Maria Millan, Andy Moua, Tom Sarun, Pada Ly Vang* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tanya E. Moore* *Moore Law Firm* *300 South First St., Suite 342* *San Jose, CA 95113*. (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) against All Defendants by Jose Escobedo. Attorney Moore, Tanya E. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11193224) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Tanya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.