(PC) Carter-Maddox v. California Substance Abuse Treatment and Facility et al
Plaintiff: Keith Reagan Carter-Maddox
Defendant: California Substance Abuse Treatment and Facility and State of California
Case Number: 1:2023cv01632
Filed: November 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: No District Court Judge
Referring Judge: Gary S Austin
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER DENYING #11 Motion for the Appointment of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/7/2023. (Rivera, O)
December 8, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #12 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel served on Keith Reagan Carter-Maddox. (Rivera, O)
December 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Keith Reagan Carter-Maddox. (Lawrence, A)
December 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Lawrence, A)
December 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Due to the elevation of U.S. District Judge Ana I. de Alba to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the court finds it necessary to temporarily reassign this case to No District Court Judge (NODJ) until a new district judge is appointed. (Davis, D)
December 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of Case for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies; ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Appoint District Judge to this Matter, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/30/2023. Referred to Judge NODJ. Objections to F&R due by 12/14/2023.(Maldonado, C)
December 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to No District Court Judge and Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. The new case number is: 1:23-cv-01632-NODJ-GSA. (Maldonado, C)
December 1, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Findings and Recommendations, 7 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Keith Reagan Carter-Maddox. (Maldonado, C)
December 1, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order Reassigning No District Court Judge (NODJ), served on Keith Reagan Carter-Maddox. (Gonzalez, R)
November 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/30/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP Motion) (Maldonado, C)
November 30, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Keith Reagan Carter-Maddox. (Maldonado, C)
November 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Keith Reagan Carter-Maddox. (Maldonado, C)
November 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 12/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Marrujo, C)
November 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a certified prison trust account statement for Keith Reagan Carter-Maddox, CDCR No. BM-1454 to the Clerk's Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The prison trust account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in.pdf format to FilingsFresno@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Text Only Entry) (Marrujo, C)
November 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Keith Reagan Carter-Maddox. (Marrujo, C)
November 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against California Substance Abuse Treatment and Facility, State of California by Keith Reagan Carter-Maddox.(Marrujo, C)
November 21, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Keith Reagan Carter-Maddox. (Marrujo, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Carter-Maddox v. California Substance Abuse Treatment and Facility et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Reagan Carter-Maddox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Substance Abuse Treatment and Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?