(PC) Guillen v. Schleicher, et al.
Plaintiff: Gabriel Matthew Guillen
Defendant: Tyler Schleicher, Edgar Galdamez and Jamie Orozco
Case Number: 1:2023cv01679
Filed: December 4, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
Presiding Judge: Gary S Austin
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Matter Should not be Dismissed for Failure to Obey Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 01/31/2024. Plaintiff's Response to the Showing of Cause or in the Alternative, his Filing of an In Forma Pauperis Application or Payment of Filing Fee in Full is due 3/1/2024. (Maldonado, C)
February 1, 2024 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order to Show Cause, served on Gabriel Matthew Guillen. (Maldonado, C)
December 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Lundstrom, T)
December 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/5/2023. (Navarro, F)
December 6, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order served on Gabriel Matthew Guillen. (Navarro, F)
December 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 1/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Lundstrom, T)
December 5, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Gabriel Matthew Guillen. (Lundstrom, T)
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Gabriel Matthew Guillen. (Lundstrom, T)
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Edgar Galdamez, Jamie Orozco, Tyler Schleicher by Gabriel Matthew Guillen.(Lundstrom, T)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Guillen v. Schleicher, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gabriel Matthew Guillen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tyler Schleicher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edgar Galdamez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jamie Orozco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?