EP. v. Tehachapi Unified School District, et al.
| E. P. |
| Tehachapi Unified School District and Jason Grimes |
| 1:2023cv01724 |
| December 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Christopher D Baker |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Jason Grimes served on 1/20/2024, answer due 2/12/2024. (Dudukgian, Goriune) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Tehachapi Unified School District served on 1/22/2024, answer due 2/12/2024. (Dudukgian, Goriune) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/6/2024 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield (CDB) before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 CDB Worksheet, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Jason Grimes, Tehachapi Unified School District* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Goriune Dudukgian* *California Justice Project* *35 N. Lake Ave., Ste 710* *Pasadena, CA 91101*. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jason Grimes, Tehachapi Unified School District by E. P.. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11243104) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dudukgian, Goriune) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
