Flores v. Tesla, Inc.
| Raymond Flores |
| Tesla, Inc. a Delaware Corporation Doing business as Tesla Motors, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv01735 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Christopher D Baker |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry), signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 1/24/2024: In light of the parties' stipulation to extend Defendant's time to file a responsive pleading through March 19, 2023 (Doc. #8 ), the scheduling conference set for March 13, 2024 (Doc. #3 ) is HEREBY CONTINUED to April 10, 2024, at 9:00 AM in Bakersfield (CDB) before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. (Hall, S)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Tesla To Respond to the Complaint (L.R. 144(a)) by Tesla, Inc.. Attorney Schrader, David L added. (Schrader, David) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry), signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 1/16/2024: For good cause shown through the representations of counsel for Plaintiff (Doc. #6 ) in response to the Court's show cause order, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's Order to Show Cause (Doc. #4 ) is DISCHARGED. (Hall, S)
|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to #4 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE by Raymond Flores. (Goolsby, Laura) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Tesla, Inc. on 12/21/2023, Answer due 2/20/2024 (Zohdy, Tarek) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE in Writing Why This Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 12/21/2023. Show Cause Response due within 21 days. (Hall, S)
|
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/13/2024 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield (CDB) before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A(m), #2 Worksheet, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Tesla, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tarek H. Zohdy* *Capstone Law APC* *1875 Century Park East, Suite 1000* *Los Angeles, CA 90067*. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tesla, Inc. by Raymond Flores. Attorney Zohdy, Tarek H. added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11247655) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zohdy, Tarek) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Flores v. Tesla, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Raymond Flores | |
| Represented By: | Tarek H. Zohdy |
| Represented By: | Cody Robert Padgett |
| Represented By: | Laura Ellen Goolsby |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tesla, Inc. a Delaware Corporation Doing business as Tesla Motors, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | David L Schrader |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
