METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ACDF, LLC, a California limited liability company, as successor by merger to 104 PARTNERS, LLC et al
| METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| DARIUS ASSEMI, GRANTOR FRESNO CLOVIS INVESTMENTS, LLC, WILLOW AVENUE INVESTMENTS, LLC, FARSHID ASSEMI, ASHLAN & HAYES INVESTMENTS, LLC, MARICOPA ORCHARDS, LLC, ACDF, LLC, a California limited liability company, as successor by merger to 104 PARTNERS, LLC and FARID ASSEMI |
| 1:2024at00848 |
| October 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Foreclosure |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Woods, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF LOAN AGREEMENT; BREACH OF GUARANTY; JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE; SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER; INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; AND REPLEVIN against All Defendants by METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. Attorney Woods, Thomas Andrew added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11814341) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet) (Woods, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
