Griffith v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc. et al
| Jason Griffith |
| Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax Information Services LLC and Trans Union LLC |
| 1:2024cv00017 |
| January 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| No District Court Judge |
| Christopher D Baker |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 4/1/2024 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield (CDB) before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. (Attachments: #1 Worksheet, #2 Order Reassinging NODJ, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Flores, E) |
| RECEIPT number ACAEDC-11270049 for $405.00 for Harley Davidson Financial Services, Inc. from Alexandra Leanne Hider. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.. (Hider, Alexandra) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc. (Hider, Alexandra) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Kern County Superior Court, case number BCV-23-103933 by Jason Griffith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Complaint), #2 Exhibit B (Notice to State Court))(Hider, Alexandra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
