Haley v. MWI Veterinary Supply Co. et al
| Julissa Lenay Haley |
| MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and Jeff Smith |
| 1:2024cv00060 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| No District Court Judge |
| Helena M Barch-Kuchta |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REPLY by Julissa Lenay Haley re #10 Motion to Remand. (Fagnani, Bradley) |
| Filing 13 OPPOSITION by MWI Veterinary Supply Co. to #10 Motion to Remand. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Declaration of Susan Coldren, #3 Declaration of Beth Diodato)(Frederick, Andrew) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS by Bradley Raymond Fagnani. (Fagnani, Bradley) |
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER ISSUED BY CHIEF JUDGE KIMBERLY J. MUELLER on 2/09/2024: (Text Only Entry) The parties are advised that as provided by Local Rule 230(g), the recently filed #10 motion to remand will be decided on the papers unless or until further order of the Court. No hearing will be calendared. Local Rule 230, as revised March 1, 2022, will govern the filing of oppositions and replies. The Court encourages the parties to consider Magistrate Judge consent for all purposes or for the limited purpose of deciding this motion as this may alleviate some of the delays caused by the judicial resource emergency currently facing the Fresno courthouse. SO ORDERED. (Gonzales, V)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to REMAND by Julissa Lenay Haley. Motion Hearing set for 3/15/2024 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 5 before No District Court Judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Motion for Remand, #2 Proposed Order)(Fagnani, Bradley) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE to Bradley Fagnani re #8 Notice of Appearance: Katherine Willis is not admitted to practice in the Eastern District of California. The attorney must be admitted before a Notice of Appearance can be filed and the attorney added as counsel of record in this case. Please visit pacer.gov to apply for admissions. (Lawrence, A) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Bradley Raymond Fagnani on behalf of Julissa Lenay Haley. (Fagnani, Bradley) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Bradley Raymond Fagnani on behalf of Julissa Lenay Haley. Attorney Fagnani, Bradley Raymond added. (Fagnani, Bradley) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Michelle Quach on behalf of MWI Veterinary Supply Co.. Attorney Quach, Michelle added. (Quach, Michelle) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 4/11/2024 at 10:00 AM in Yosemite (HBK) before Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. (Attachments: #1 Order Reassigning NODJ, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Maldonado, C) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by MWI Veterinary Supply Co.. (Frederick, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant MWI Veterinary Supply Co.. (Frederick, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by MWI Veterinary Supply Co. (Frederick, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Tulare County Superior Court, case number VCU303095 by Julissa Lenay Haley. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11288364) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Exhibit C - Answer to Complaint)(Frederick, Andrew) |
| RECEIPT Number ACAEDC-11288364 for $405.00 for Civil Filing Fee from Andrew Paul Frederick. (Rivera, O) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
