Ortiz v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
| Della Ortiz |
| P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv00079 |
| January 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| No District Court Judge |
| Helena M Barch-Kuchta |
| Kirk E Sherriff |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Due to the appointment of District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff to the bench of the Eastern District of California, this action is reassigned from No District Court Judge (NODJ) to District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff for all further proceedings. All dates currently set in this reassigned action shall remain pending subject to further order of the court. (Attachments: #1 KES Standing Order) (Sant Agata, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order Reassigning Newly Appointed District Judge, served on Anna Okhovat NCAED. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 9 OPPOSITION by P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. to #7 Motion to Remand,. (Gobel, Sevan) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER ISSUED BY CHIEF JUDGE KIMBERLY J. MUELLER:on 2/16/2024: (Text Only Entry): The parties are advised that as provided by Local Rule 230(g), the recently filed #7 motion to remand will be decided on the papers unless or until further order of the Court. The hearing currently set for 03/20/2024 is vacated. Local Rule 230, as revised March 1, 2022, will govern the filing of oppositions and replies. The Court encourages the parties to consider Magistrate Judge consent for all purposes or for the limited purpose of deciding this motion as this may alleviate some of the delays caused by the judicial resource emergency currently facing the Fresno courthouse. SO ORDERED. (Gonzales, V)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to REMAND AND LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT by Della Ortiz. Motion Hearing set for 3/20/2024 at 01:00 PM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Steven Ortiz in Support of Motion to Amend and Remand, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F)(Ortiz, Steven) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER (TEXT ONLY): This case was removed from Fresno Superior Court to this Court on 01/17/2024. (Doc. No. #1 ). A mandatory telephonic Initial Scheduling Conference (ISC) was set before the undersigned for 05/09/2024. (Doc. No. #3 ). The parties must hold their Rule 26(f) conference at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the ISC, but may meet sooner, to prepare their Joint Scheduling Report. (Id. at 2). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not permit the parties to conduct discovery prior to their Rule 26(f) conference, with one exception. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d). To ensure the just and speedy determination of this action, Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, the Court will advance the ISC to a date no later than fourteen (14) days after the parties file a Joint Scheduling Report. The Court will not advance or reschedule the 05/09/2024 ISC unless, and until, the parties file a Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 2/9/2024. (Apodaca, P)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Minute Order, served on Anna Okhovat NCAED. (Apodaca, P) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Steven Andrew Ortiz on behalf of Della Ortiz. (Ortiz, Steven) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE: Our record indicates Attorney Anna Okhovat and Attorney Steven Ortiz are not currently admitted to practice in the Eastern District of California. Attorney is directed to apply for Admission through PACER.gov. (Xiong, J.) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/9/2024 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (HBK) before Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. (Attachments: #1 Order Reassigning NODJ, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Xiong, J.) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO, INC. (Gobel, Sevan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Fresno Superior, case number 23CECG04742 by DELLA ORTIZ. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11294711) (Attachments: #1 Declaration Sevan Gobel, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Notice Interested Parties, #8 Proof of Service Removal)(Gobel, Sevan) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Clerk's Notice, #3 Civil New Case Documents for NODJ served on Anna Okhovat NCAED, Steven Ortiz NCAED. (Xiong, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ortiz v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Della Ortiz | |
| Represented By: | Anna Okhovat, NCAED |
| Represented By: | Steven Ortiz, NCAED |
| Represented By: | Steven Andrew Ortiz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Sevan Gobel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
