Herrera v. Ford Motor Company
Leanne Nicole Herrera |
Ford Motor Company |
1:2024cv00101 |
January 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Barbara A McAuliffe |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER (TEXT Only): The parties shall appear at the SCHEDULING CONFERENCE currently set for May 1, 2024, at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe with each party connecting remotely either via Zoom video conference or Zoom telephone number. The parties shall be provided with the Zoom ID and password by the Courtroom Deputy prior to the conference. The Zoom ID number and password are confidential and are not to be shared. Appropriate court attire required. Minute order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/13/2024. (Valdez, E) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Oppenheim, Michael) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Michael William Oppenheim on behalf of Leanne Nicole Herrera. (Oppenheim, Michael) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Sepehr Daghighian on behalf of Leanne Nicole Herrera. (Daghighian, Sepehr) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Michael Harris Rosenstein on behalf of Leanne Nicole Herrera. (Rosenstein, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/1/2024 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A(m), #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Tulare, case number VCU304363 by Leanne Nicole Herrera. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11303484) (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Hang A. Do, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B - Ford's Answer, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C - All Pleadings, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D - Service Records, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E - 10K Filing, #7 Notice Notice of Jury Demand, #8 Notice Notice of Interested Parties, #9 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Proof of Service Certificate of Service)(Do, Hang) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Herrera v. Ford Motor Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Leanne Nicole Herrera | |
Represented By: | Michael William Oppenheim |
Represented By: | Michael Harris Rosenstein |
Represented By: | Sepehr Daghighian |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
Represented By: | Hang Alexandra Do |
Represented By: | Robert Allen Shields |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.