(HC) Ramirez v. CDCR Secretary
Petitioner: Saul Miranda Ramirez
Respondent: CDCR Secretary
Case Number: 1:2024cv00163
Filed: February 6, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sheila K Oberto
Referring Judge: Jennifer L Thurston
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 JUDGMENT dated *3/6/2024* pursuant to order signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/6/2024. (Lundstrom, T)
March 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER adopting #5 Findings and Recommendations; dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and directing Clerk of Court to enter Judgment and close case; declining to issue Certificate of Appealability signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/6/2024. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)
March 6, 2024 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Judgment, #7 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations served on Saul Miranda Ramirez. (Lundstrom, T)
March 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 OBJECTIONS to FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS #5 by Petitioner Saul Miranda Ramirez. (Lundstrom, T)
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Assign District Judge; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Summarily Dismiss #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Jurisdiction, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/8/2024. Referred to Judge Thurston; Objections to F&R due within twenty-one (21) days. (Rivera, O)
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston and Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The new case number is: 1:24-cv-00163-JLT-SKO (HC). (Rivera, O)
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, #5 Findings and Recommendations served on Saul Miranda Ramirez. (Rivera, O)
February 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 3/11/2024. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Lundstrom, T)
February 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Saul Miranda Ramirez signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/6/2024. (Lundstrom, T)
February 6, 2024 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Order Authorizing IFP Status, #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Saul Miranda Ramirez. (Lundstrom, T)
February 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against CDCR Secretary by Saul Miranda Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Part 2)(Lundstrom, T).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Ramirez v. CDCR Secretary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Saul Miranda Ramirez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CDCR Secretary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?