(SS) Cruz v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Ronnie Cruz
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2024cv00169
Filed: February 6, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Gary S Austin
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2024 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Pena, Jonathan)
March 6, 2024 Filing 8 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Social Security Complaint, #6 Summons, #5 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, #7 Social Security New Case Documents for MJ as Presider served on Commissioner Social Security Pursuant to E-Service Agreement. (Xiong, J.)
March 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 6/7/2024. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Xiong, J.)
March 6, 2024 Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Jonathan Omar Pena* *Pena & Bromberg, Attorneys at Law* *2440 Tulare St. Suite 320* *Fresno, CA 93721*. (Xiong, J.)
March 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/6/2024. (Xiong, J.)
March 1, 2024 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Marrujo, C)
February 10, 2024 Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Martin, Justin)
February 10, 2024 Filing 3 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Justin Lane Martin, GOVT for Commissioner of Social Security (Martin, Justin)
February 6, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Ronnie Cruz. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pena, Jonathan)
February 6, 2024 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Ronnie Cruz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pena, Jonathan)
February 6, 2024 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Maldonado, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (SS) Cruz v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronnie Cruz
Represented By: Jonathan Omar Pena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Social Security Admin- SS E-Service
Represented By: US Attorney's Office- SS E-Service
Represented By: Justin Lane Martin, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?