(SS) Aninion v. Commissioner of Social Security
Virgil Parami Aninion |
Commissioner of Social Security |
1:2024cv00243 |
February 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Gary S Austin |
William B Shubb |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Pena, Jonathan) |
Filing 11 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 03/28/2024: The Court, having considered the equitable division and efficient and economical determination of court business, finds the necessity for reassignment. This case is REASSIGNED to Senior District Judge William B. Shubb for all further proceedings. The No District Judge Assignment terminated. The case number on all future documents shall be: 1:24-cv-00243-WBS-GSA (SS). (TEXT ONLY ENTRY)(Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 10 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #7 Order Vacating Findings and Recommendations, #8 Summons, #1 Social Security Complaint, #9 Social Security New Case Documents for DJ served on Commissioner of Social Security. (Lawrence, A) |
Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL: Consent or Decline due by 6/10/2024. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Lawrence, A) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Jonathan Omar Pena* *Pena & Bromberg, Attorneys at Law* *2440 Tulare St., Suite 320* *Fresno, CA 93721*. (Lawrence, A) |
Filing 7 ORDER TERMINATING #6 Findings and Recommendations as Moot; ORDER TERMINATING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP as Moot; and ORDER Directing Clerk to Issue New Case Documents signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/7/2024. (Lawrence, A) |
PAYMENT for Civil Case filing fee in the amount of $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11386110. (Pena, Jonathan) |
Filing 6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to deny #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/29/2024. Referred to Judge No District Judge. Objections to F&R within 14-Days. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to No District Court Judge and Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. The new case number is: 1:24-cv-00243-NODJ-GSA-(SS). (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Martin, Justin) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Justin Lane Martin, GOVT for Commissioner of Social Security (Martin, Justin) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Virgil Parami Aninion. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pena, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Virgil Parami Aninion. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pena, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.