(HC) Larios v. Alomari
Roque Larios, Jr. |
Ismael Alomari |
1:2024cv00302 |
March 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sheila K Oberto |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/15/2024. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 8 ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Roque Larios, Jr. signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/12/2024. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 7 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Central; Case Number 2:24-cv-01849. |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #8 Order Authorizing IFP Status served on Roque Larios Jr. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 6 ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA by Judge Percy Anderson. In exercise of its discretion and in furtherance of justice, the Court transfers this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. (See document for further details). (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (aco) [Transferred from cacd on 3/12/2024.] |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (lh) [Transferred from cacd on 3/12/2024.] |
Filing 4 DECLARATION in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Petitioner Roque Larios, Jr. (lh) [Transferred from cacd on 3/12/2024.] |
Filing 3 MOTION for Stay and Abeyance, filed by Petitioner Roque Larios, Jr. (lh) [Transferred from cacd on 3/12/2024.] |
Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Roque Larios, Jr. The Petitioner does not consent. (lh) [Transferred from cacd on 3/12/2024.] |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (Filing Fee $5 DUE), filed by Petitioner Roque Larios, Jr. (lh) [Transferred from cacd on 3/12/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (HC) Larios v. Alomari | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Roque Larios, Jr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Ismael Alomari | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.