(HC) Larios v. Alomari
Petitioner: Roque Larios, Jr.
Respondent: Ismael Alomari
Case Number: 1:2024cv00302
Filed: March 12, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sheila K Oberto
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2024 Filing 9 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/15/2024. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Lundstrom, T)
March 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Roque Larios, Jr. signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/12/2024. (Lundstrom, T)
March 12, 2024 Filing 7 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Central; Case Number 2:24-cv-01849.
March 12, 2024 SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #8 Order Authorizing IFP Status served on Roque Larios Jr. (Lundstrom, T)
March 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA by Judge Percy Anderson. In exercise of its discretion and in furtherance of justice, the Court transfers this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. (See document for further details). (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (aco) [Transferred from cacd on 3/12/2024.]
March 11, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (lh) [Transferred from cacd on 3/12/2024.]
March 1, 2024 Filing 4 DECLARATION in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Petitioner Roque Larios, Jr. (lh) [Transferred from cacd on 3/12/2024.]
March 1, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION for Stay and Abeyance, filed by Petitioner Roque Larios, Jr. (lh) [Transferred from cacd on 3/12/2024.]
March 1, 2024 Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Roque Larios, Jr. The Petitioner does not consent. (lh) [Transferred from cacd on 3/12/2024.]
March 1, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (Filing Fee $5 DUE), filed by Petitioner Roque Larios, Jr. (lh) [Transferred from cacd on 3/12/2024.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Larios v. Alomari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roque Larios, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ismael Alomari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?