(HC) Sharp v. Borla
| Anthony Andre Sharp |
| Edward Borla |
| 1:2024cv00326 |
| March 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Kirk E Sherriff |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff and Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The new case number is: 1:24-cv-00326-KES-EPG (HC). (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rivera, O) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 8 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Anthony Andre Sharp. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 6
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/15/2024. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. Consent or Decline due by 6/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Lundstrom, T)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition, served on Anthony Andre Sharp. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Lundstrom, T) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER AUTHORIZING #2 IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Anthony Sharp signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 03/19/2024. (Maldonado, C)
|
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/22/2024. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Maldonado, C) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #4 Order Authorizing IFP Status, Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Anthony Andre Sharp. (Maldonado, C) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Anthony Andre Sharp. (Maldonado, C) |
| Filing 1 (2254) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Edward Borla by Anthony Andre Sharp.(Maldonado, C) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Sharp v. Borla | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Anthony Andre Sharp | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Edward Borla | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
