Escobedo v. Sharma, et al.
| Jose Escobedo |
| Rajeev Sharma, Meera Sharma, Trustee of the Sharma Family Living Trust of, Angelica Cortez Friend Doing business as Mainstreet Cafe and Carroll Duane Friend Doing business as Mainstreet Cafe |
| 1:2024cv00419 |
| April 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 7/9/2024 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A(m), #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Angelica Cortez Friend, Carroll Duane Friend, Meera Sharma, Rajeev Sharma* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tanya E. Moore* *Moore Law Firm, P.C.* *300 South First St., Suite 342* *San Jose, CA 95113*. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under Americans with Disabilities Act against All Defendants by Jose Escobedo. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11455880) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Tanya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
